Longitudinal Analysis of Training Load Across Two Competitive Seasons in Collegiate Women’s Soccer Original Research
Main Article Content
Keywords
athlete monitoring, TRIMP, physiological efficiency
Abstract
Introduction: Monitoring training load is essential for optimizing performance and supporting long-term adaptation in team sport athletes. While heart rate and GPS technologies are widely used in applied settings, limited longitudinal data exist describing how internal and external load interact across multiple seasons in collegiate women’s soccer.
Methods: A retrospective longitudinal cohort design was used to examine NCAA Division II women’s soccer athletes monitored across the 2023 and 2024 competitive seasons. Internal training load was assessed using heart rate–derived metrics from a FirstBeat monitoring system, including Training Impulse (TRIMP), average and maximal heart rate, and percentage of time spent above 85% HRmax. External load was quantified using GPS measures, including total distance, high-speed running distance, sprint count, sprint distance, and work rate. Data from training sessions and matches were aggregated by season. Linear mixed effects models evaluated seasonal differences with the athlete treated as a random effect.
Results: Internal training load remained stable across seasons, with no significant differences in mean session TRIMP (2023: 308.0 ± 74.6 AU; 2024: 309.7 ± 71.2 AU; p = 0.68) or average exercise intensity (71.2 ± 6.4 vs. 71.5 ± 6.1% HRmax; p = 0.61). In contrast, match play imposed substantially greater external demands than training in both seasons (p < 0.001), with large to very large effect sizes across all GPS variables. Despite increased external demands, the TRIMP to distance ratio decreased from 64.1 to 57.2 TRIMP/mile⁻¹, indicating improved physiological efficiency.
Conclusions: Collegiate women’s soccer athletes demonstrated stable internal load despite large competition demands, supporting effective long-term load regulation and adaptation. Integrating heart rate and GPS metrics provides a comprehensive framework for monitoring training stress and informing evidence-based periodization strategies.
References
1. Banister EW. Modeling elite athletic performance. Phys Sportsmed. 1991;19(3):106 116.
2. Impellizzeri FM, Marcora SM, Coutts AJ. Internal and external training load: 15 years on. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14(2):270 273.
3. Morton RH, Fitz-Clarke JR, Banister EW. Modeling human performance in running. J Appl Physiol. 1990;69(3):1171 1177.
4. Stølen T, Chamari K, Castagna C, Wisløff U. Physiology of soccer. Sports Med. 2005;35(6):501 536.
5. Julian R, Hecksteden A, Fullagar HHK, Meyer T. The effects of menstrual cycle phase on physical performance in female athletes. Sports Med. 2021;51(9):1813 1827.
6. Costa JA, Rago V, Brito P, et al. Training in women soccer players: a systematic review on training load monitoring. Front Psychol. 2022;13:943857.
7. Jagim AR, Askow AT, Carvalho V, et al. Seasonal accumulated workloads in collegiate women’s soccer. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2022;7(1):11.
8. Perrotta AS, Day BD, Correa CJ, et al. Physiological adaptations across a two year preseason in female collegiate soccer players. Front Sports Act Living. 2024;6:1353129.
9. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
10. Issurin VB. New horizons for the methodology and physiology of training periodization. Sports Med. 2010;40(3):189 206.
11. Stevens TG, de Ruiter CJ, van Niel C, van de Rhee R, Beek PJ, Savelsbergh GJP. Monitoring training load in soccer. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(Suppl 2):S2 6–S2 16.
12. Gabbett TJ. The training injury prevention paradox. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(5):273 280.
13. Afshar Naseri MB. Beyond performance: A narrative review of prioritizing recovery and mental conditioning of athletes in times of crisis. J Sport Rehabil Sci. 2025;3(1):26-38.
14. Goulart KN, Coimbra CC, Campos HO, Drummond LR, Ogando PH, Brown G, Couto BP, Duffield R, Wanner SP. Fatigue and recovery time course after female soccer matches: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med Open. 2022;8(1):72.
